[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250827145427.46819-2-nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 16:54:25 +0200
From: <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
To: ARM Maintainers <arm@...nel.org>, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Ryan Wanner <ryan.wanner@...rochip.com>,
Varshini Rajendran <varshini.rajendran@...rochip.com>, Claudiu Beznea
<claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: at91: pm: fix .uhp_udp_mask specification for current SoCs
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
All SoCs using this structure field .uhp_udp_mask in configuration
index 4 don't have the bit 7 specified: sam9x60 nor sam9x75.
Remove this bit from the mask definition to match register layout.
This mask is used in function at91_pm_verify_clocks().
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
index 3aa20038ad93..35058b99069c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
@@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@ static const struct pmc_info pmc_infos[] __initconst = {
.version = AT91_PMC_V1,
},
{
- .uhp_udp_mask = AT91SAM926x_PMC_UHP | AT91SAM926x_PMC_UDP,
+ .uhp_udp_mask = AT91SAM926x_PMC_UHP,
.mckr = 0x28,
.version = AT91_PMC_V2,
},
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists