[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250827172828.GP10519@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 18:28:28 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
nxne.cnse.osdt.itp.upstreaming@...el.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v5 00/13] idpf: add XDP support
On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 05:54:54PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> Add XDP support (w/o XSk for now) to the idpf driver using the libeth_xdp
> sublib. All possible verdicts, .ndo_xdp_xmit(), multi-buffer etc. are here.
> In general, nothing outstanding comparing to ice, except performance --
> let's say, up to 2x for .ndo_xdp_xmit() on certain platforms and
> scenarios.
> idpf doesn't support VLAN Rx offload, so only the hash hint is
> available for now.
>
> Patches 1-7 are prereqs, without which XDP would either not work at all or
> work slower/worse/...
Hi Alexander,
I'm wondering if you could give a hash that this patch-set applies to.
Or a branch where it has been applied.
I suspect it's terribly obvious how to do this, but I'm drawing a blank here.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists