[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250827185825.GA894342@bhelgaas>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 13:58:25 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Christian Bruel <christian.bruel@...s.st.com>
Cc: lpieralisi@...nel.org, kwilczynski@...nel.org, mani@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
corbet@....net, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, shradha.t@...sung.com,
mayank.rana@....qualcomm.com, namcao@...utronix.de,
qiang.yu@....qualcomm.com, thippeswamy.havalige@....com,
inochiama@...il.com, quic_schintav@...cinc.com,
johan+linaro@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] PCI: stm32: Add PCIe Endpoint support for
STM32MP25
On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 09:54:06AM +0200, Christian Bruel wrote:
> Add driver to configure the STM32MP25 SoC PCIe Gen1 2.5GT/s or Gen2 5GT/s
> controller based on the DesignWare PCIe core in endpoint mode.
> +static void stm32_pcie_perst_deassert(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> +{
> + struct stm32_pcie *stm32_pcie = to_stm32_pcie(pci);
> + struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> + struct dw_pcie_ep *ep = &pci->ep;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "PERST de-asserted by host\n");
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to resume runtime PM: %d\n", ret);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + ret = stm32_pcie_enable_resources(stm32_pcie);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable resources: %d\n", ret);
> + goto err_pm_put_sync;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Need to reprogram the configuration space registers here because the
> + * DBI registers were incorrectly reset by the PHY RCC during phy_init().
Is this incorrect reset of DBI registers a software issue or some kind
of hardware erratum that might be fixed someday? Or maybe it's just a
characteristic of the hardware and thus not really "incorrect"?
I do see that qcom_pcie_perst_deassert() in pcie-qcom-ep.c also calls
dw_pcie_ep_init_registers() in the qcom_pcie_ep_perst_irq_thread()
path.
So does pex_ep_event_pex_rst_deassert() (pcie-tegra194.c) in the
tegra_pcie_ep_pex_rst_irq() path.
But as far as I can tell, none of the other dwc drivers need this, so
maybe it's something to do with the glue around the DWC core?
> + */
> + ret = dw_pcie_ep_init_registers(ep);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to complete initialization: %d\n", ret);
> + goto err_disable_resources;
> + }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists