[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6079552e9c2e62ef84c835cdf81d7d70d8987031.camel@irl.hu>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 21:18:29 +0200
From: Gergo Koteles <soyer@....hu>
To: "Ding, Shenghao" <shenghao-ding@...com>,
"tiwai@...e.de" <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"13564923607@....com" <13564923607@....com>,
"13916275206@....com" <13916275206@....com>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Xu, Baojun" <baojun.xu@...com>,
"Baojun.Xu@....com" <Baojun.Xu@....com>,
"Ji, Jesse" <jesse-ji@...com>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2] ALSA: hda/tas2781: Fix EFI name for
calibration beginning with 1 instead of 0
Hi Shenghao,
On Wed, 2025-08-27 at 14:15 +0000, Ding, Shenghao wrote:
> Long time no see. Thanks for pointing that out.
> I'm preparing a new patch to correct it.
>
>
Yeah, the amps worked well, so no need to write :)
Rolling distros are moving to kernel 6.16 soon, so I'm worried about
the speakers.
Can the amplifier protect the speaker even with completely wrong
calibration values?
Thanks,
Gergo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists