lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eaefefb6-7ced-4c47-8bff-bae83f143b72@vivo.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 10:15:03 +0800
From: Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@...o.com>
To: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@....com>, Min Ma <min.ma@....com>,
 Oded Gabbay <ogabbay@...nel.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] accel/amdxdna: Use int instead of u32 to store error
 codes


在 2025/8/27 0:31, Lizhi Hou 写道:
>
> On 8/26/25 00:29, Qianfeng Rong wrote:
>> Change the 'ret' variable from u32 to int to store -EINVAL, reducing
>> potential risks such as incorrect results when comparing 'ret' with
>> error codes.
>
> Sounds this fixes code issue. Could you add "Fixes" tag?
>
>

The 'ret' variable stores negative error codes directly.  Storing
error codes in u32 (an unsigned type) causes no runtime issues but is
stylistically inconsistent and very ugly.

Logical errors with 'ret' only occur when it is compared against negative
error codes. For example:

u32 ret = -EINVAL; // ret becomes an extremely large unsigned integer

if (ret == -EINVAL) // This condition will never be true

This patch reduces the likelihood of such issues occurring. Since it does
not fix an existing bug, I believe there is no need to add a Fixes tag.

Best regards,
Qianfeng


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ