[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d11e20c1-1162-422f-8915-97efa69644c7@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 15:39:43 -0500
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, corbet@....net,
tony.luck@...el.com, Dave.Martin@....com, james.morse@....com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Cc: x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
paulmck@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com,
david@...hat.com, arnd@...db.de, fvdl@...gle.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
yosry.ahmed@...ux.dev, sohil.mehta@...el.com, xin@...or.com,
kai.huang@...el.com, xiaoyao.li@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org,
me@...aill.net, mario.limonciello@....com, xin3.li@...el.com,
ebiggers@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, chang.seok.bae@...el.com,
andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, perry.yuan@....com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, manali.shukla@....com, gautham.shenoy@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 06/10] fs/resctrl: Add user interface to enable/disable
io_alloc feature
On 8/22/25 17:53, Moger, Babu wrote:
> Hi Reinette,
>
> On 8/7/2025 8:49 PM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> Hi Babu,
>>
>> On 8/5/25 4:30 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>>> "io_alloc" feature in resctrl enables direct insertion of data from I/O
>>> devices into the cache.
>>>
>>> On AMD systems, when io_alloc is enabled, the highest CLOSID is reserved
>>> exclusively for I/O allocation traffic and is no longer available for
>>> general CPU cache allocation. Users are encouraged to enable it only when
>>> running workloads that can benefit from this functionality.
>>>
>>> Since CLOSIDs are managed by resctrl fs, it is least invasive to make the
>>> "io_alloc is supported by maximum supported CLOSID" part of the initial
>>> resctrl fs support for io_alloc. Take care not to expose this use of
>>> CLOSID
>>> for io_alloc to user space so that this is not required from other
>>> architectures that may support io_alloc differently in the future.
>>>
>>> Introduce user interface to enable/disable io_alloc feature.
>> Please include high level overview of what this patch does to enable
>> and disable io_alloc. Doing so will help connect why the changelog contains
>> information about CLOSID management.
>
>
> Sure.
>
>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c b/fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>>> index d495a5d5c9d5..bf982eab7b18 100644
>>> --- a/fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>>> +++ b/fs/resctrl/ctrlmondata.c
>>> @@ -685,3 +685,140 @@ int resctrl_io_alloc_show(struct kernfs_open_file
>>> *of, struct seq_file *seq, voi
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * resctrl_io_alloc_closid_supported() - io_alloc feature utilizes the
>>> + * highest CLOSID value to direct I/O traffic. Ensure that
>>> io_alloc_closid
>>> + * is in the supported range.
>>> + */
>>> +static bool resctrl_io_alloc_closid_supported(u32 io_alloc_closid)
>>> +{
>>> + return io_alloc_closid < closids_supported();
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static struct resctrl_schema *resctrl_get_schema(enum
>>> resctrl_conf_type type)
>>> +{
>>> + struct resctrl_schema *schema;
>>> +
>>> + list_for_each_entry(schema, &resctrl_schema_all, list) {
>>> + if (schema->conf_type == type)
>>> + return schema;
>> This does not look right. More than one resource can have the same
>> configuration type, no?
>> Think about L2 and L3 having CDP enabled ...
>> Looks like this is missing a resource type as parameter and a check for
>> the resource ...
>> but is this function even necessary (more below)?
>
> May not be required. Comments below.
>
>>
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * Initialize io_alloc CLOSID cache resource CBM with all usable (shared
>>> + * and unused) cache portions.
>>> + */
>>> +static int resctrl_io_alloc_init_cbm(struct resctrl_schema *s, u32
>>> closid)
>>> +{
>>> + struct rdt_resource *r = s->res;
>> Needs reverse fir.
>
>
> Sure.
>
>>
>>> + enum resctrl_conf_type peer_type;
>>> + struct resctrl_schema *peer_s;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + rdt_staged_configs_clear();
>>> +
>>> + ret = rdtgroup_init_cat(s, closid);
>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>> + goto out;
>>> +
>>> + /* Initialize schema for both CDP_DATA and CDP_CODE when CDP is
>>> enabled */
>>> + if (resctrl_arch_get_cdp_enabled(r->rid)) {
>>> + peer_type = resctrl_peer_type(s->conf_type);
>>> + peer_s = resctrl_get_schema(peer_type);
>>> + if (peer_s) {
>>> + ret = rdtgroup_init_cat(peer_s, closid);
>> This is unexpected. In v7 I suggested that when parsing the CBM of one
>> of the CDP
>> resources it is not necessary to do so again for the peer. The CBM can be
>> parsed *once* and the configuration just copied over. See:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/
>> lkml/82045638-2b26-4682-9374-1c3e400a580a@...el.com/
>
> Let met try to understand.
>
> So, rdtgroup_init_cat() sets up the staged _config for the specific CDP
> type for all the domains.
>
> We need to apply those staged_configs to its peer type on all the domains.
>
> Something like this?
>
> /* Initialize staged_config of the peer type when CDP is enabled */
> if (resctrl_arch_get_cdp_enabled(r->rid)) {
> list_for_each_entry(d, &s->res->ctrl_domains, hdr.list) {
> cfg = &d->staged_config[s->conf_type];
> cfg_peer = &d->staged_config[peer_type];
> cfg_peer->new_ctrl = cfg->new_ctrl;
> cfg_peer->have_new_ctrl = cfg->have_new_ctrl;
> }
> }
>
Replaced with following snippet.
/* Initialize schema for both CDP_DATA and CDP_CODE when CDP is enabled */
+ if (resctrl_arch_get_cdp_enabled(r->rid)) {
+ peer_type = resctrl_peer_type(s->conf_type);
+ list_for_each_entry(d, &s->res->ctrl_domains, hdr.list)
+ memcpy(&d->staged_config[peer_type],
+ &d->staged_config[s->conf_type],
+ sizeof(*d->staged_config));
+ }
>
>>
>> Generally when feedback is provided it is good to check all places in
>> series where
>> it is relevant. oh ... but looking ahead you ignored the feedback in the
>> patch
>> it was given also :(
>
>
> My bad.
>
> I will address that.
>
> Thanks
>
> Babu
>
>
--
Thanks
Babu Moger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists