[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250827215318.GA28201@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 14:53:18 -0700
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: ricardo.neri@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq/debugfs: Fix a typo in IRQ effective affinity
On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 04:10:54PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 07:49:12PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12 2025 at 14:00, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > > Fix a typo in the line that prints the effective affinity of the IRQ.
> >
> > It's not a typo. It's intentionally shortened to make the output
> > tabular, which makes it more readable.
>
> Ah, I didn't see it this way.
>
> >
> > If you want 'effective' then please adjust 'affinity:' with an extra
> > space so it stays that way.
>
> Sure. I can do this.
I looked again at my proposed change. I would need to adjust 10 more lines
besides 'affinity:' to keep the alignment. Adjusting a couple of lines
would not pollute history much. Adjusting multiple lines would do more harm
than good, IMO.
Unless you think otherwise, I do not plan to pursue this change further.
BR,
Ricardo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists