linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] ceph: introduce ceph_submit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aK6QJp3rx_yUzRo5@swift.blarg.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 06:57:10 +0200
From: Max Kellermann <max@...rg.de>
To: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@....com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	"brauner@...nel.org" <brauner@...nel.org>,
	"slava@...eyko.com" <slava@...eyko.com>,
	"ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alex Markuze <amarkuze@...hat.com>,
	Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@...hat.com>,
	"willy@...radead.org" <willy@...radead.org>,
	"idryomov@...il.com" <idryomov@...il.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] ceph: introduce ceph_submit_write() method

On 2025/08/27 05:06, Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@....com> wrote:
> The open-source is space for collaboration and respect of each other. It is not
> space for offensive or bullying behavior.

This is now your third reply to a comment on your patch set (one to
Matthew and two to me), and you are still sidestepping the valid
criticism.  This time, instead of talking how to fix it, you are
explaining how well you tested this, and then this meta-comment.

No, for the bug discussion, it does not matter how well you tested
this.  If it's buggy, it's buggy.  For me, as an amateur, the bug was
obvious enough to see in the source code, and after my long
explanation, it should be easy enough for everybody else to see, isn't
it?  And no, I don't owe you a test case.  I explained the exact
conditions that need to occur for the crash to happen, and I have to
trust that you are capable of easily injecting such an error, aren't
you?

This is not what I call "collaboration" neither "respect", to me it
rather seems like ignorance.  You were not collaborating with the
reviewer and you are not respecting the bug report.  You just divert
the discussion instead of talking about the actual problems.

And, note: in both of your replies to me, you removed me from the
recipient list.  Everybody else you kept, you only removed me.  I had
to look up your replies on lore.kernel.org.  (You did not do that with
your replies to Matthew and David.)

What kind of funny behavior is that?

Max