lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aK5YH4Jbt3ZNngwR@fedora>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 08:58:07 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: linan666@...weicloud.com
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	yukuai3@...wei.com, yangerkun@...wei.com, yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: check kobject state_in_sysfs before deleting in
 blk_mq_unregister_hctx

On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 04:48:54PM +0800, linan666@...weicloud.com wrote:
> From: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>
> 
> In __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues() the return value of
> blk_mq_sysfs_register_hctxs() is not checked. If sysfs creation for hctx

Looks we should check its return value and handle the failure in both
the call site and blk_mq_sysfs_register_hctxs().

> fails, later changing the number of hw_queues or removing disk will
> trigger the following warning:
> 
>   kernfs: can not remove 'nr_tags', no directory
>   WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 637 at fs/kernfs/dir.c:1707 kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x13f/0x160
>   Call Trace:
>    remove_files.isra.1+0x38/0xb0
>    sysfs_remove_group+0x4d/0x100
>    sysfs_remove_groups+0x31/0x60
>    __kobject_del+0x23/0xf0
>    kobject_del+0x17/0x40
>    blk_mq_unregister_hctx+0x5d/0x80
>    blk_mq_sysfs_unregister_hctxs+0x94/0xd0
>    blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues+0x124/0x760
>    nullb_update_nr_hw_queues+0x71/0xf0 [null_blk]
>    nullb_device_submit_queues_store+0x92/0x120 [null_blk]
> 
> kobjct_del() was called unconditionally even if sysfs creation failed.
> Fix it by checkig the kobject creation statusbefore deleting it.
> 
> Fixes: 477e19dedc9d ("blk-mq: adjust debugfs and sysfs register when updating nr_hw_queues")
> Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-mq-sysfs.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sysfs.c b/block/blk-mq-sysfs.c
> index 24656980f443..5c399ac562ea 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-sysfs.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sysfs.c
> @@ -150,9 +150,11 @@ static void blk_mq_unregister_hctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
>  		return;
>  
>  	hctx_for_each_ctx(hctx, ctx, i)
> -		kobject_del(&ctx->kobj);
> +		if (ctx->kobj.state_in_sysfs)
> +			kobject_del(&ctx->kobj);
>  
> -	kobject_del(&hctx->kobj);
> +	if (hctx->kobj.state_in_sysfs)
> +		kobject_del(&hctx->kobj);

It is bad to use kobject internal state in block layer.


Thanks,
Ming


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ