[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d820951e-f5df-4ddb-a657-5f0cc7c3493a@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 17:48:07 +0800
From: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Askar Safin <safinaskar@...omail.com>
Cc: Byron Stanoszek <gandalf@...ds.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"julian.stecklina" <julian.stecklina@...erus-technology.de>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, rafael <rafael@...nel.org>,
torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] initrd: support erofs as initrd
On 2025/8/27 17:22, Askar Safin wrote:
> ---- On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 19:32:34 +0400 Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote ---
> > I completely agree with that point. However, since EROFS is a
> > block-based filesystem (Thanks to strictly block alignment, meta(data)
> > can work efficiently on both block-addressed storage
> > devices and byte-addressed memory devices. Also if the fsblock size
>
> As I said previously, just put your erofs image to initramfs
> (or to disk) and then (in your initramfs init) create ramdisk out of it
> or loop mount it (both ramdisks and loop devices are block devices).
>
> This way you will have erofs on top of block device.
>
> And you will not depend on initrd. (Again: I plan to remove initial ramdisk
> support, not ramdisk support per se.)
It doesn't work if end users put `init` into erofs image and sign
the whole erofs initram images with their certifications.
And it doesn't have any relationship with cpio because users need
signed image and load from memory.
Thanks,
Gao Xiang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists