linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/403] 5.4.297-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2025082712-sworn-yonder-e5f3@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2025 12:15:33 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Cc: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, f.fainelli@...il.com,
	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
	conor@...nel.org, hargar@...rosoft.com, broonie@...nel.org,
	achill@...ill.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/403] 5.4.297-rc1 review

On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 11:19:11AM +0200, Anders Roxell wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 at 09:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 03:46:37PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > On 26/08/2025 12:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.297 release.
> > > > There are 403 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 28 Aug 2025 11:08:17 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > >     https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.297-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > >     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > > >
> > > > -------------
> > > > Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
> > >
> > > ...
> > > > Prashant Malani <pmalani@...gle.com>
> > > >      cpufreq: CPPC: Mark driver with NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS flag
> > >
> > >
> > > The above commit is causing the following build failure ...
> > >
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:410:40: error: ‘CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS’ undeclared here (not in a function)
> > >   410 |         .flags = CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS | CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS,
> > >       |                                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >  make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:262: drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.o] Error 1
> > >
> > >
> > > This is seen with ARM64 but I am guessing will be seen for
> > > other targets too.
> >
> > Thanks, somehow this missed my build tests.  I've dropped it from the
> > tree now and will push out a -rc2.
> 
> [for the record]
> 
> We also see the following build regression on ARM64 with gcc-12 and clang-20.
> 
> Validation is in progress for RC2.
> 
> 
> Build Regression: 5.4.297-rc1 arm64 use of undeclared identifier
> CPUFREQ_NEED_UPDATE_LIMITS
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

Should be fixed in -rc2, right?