lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250828-selftests-bpf-v1-1-c7811cd8b98c@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 10:12:33 -0300
From: Ricardo B. Marlière <rbm@...e.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, 
 Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, 
 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, 
 Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, 
 Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, 
 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, 
 Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, 
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Ricardo B. Marlière <rbm@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix bpf_prog_detach2 usage in
 test_lirc_mode2

Commit e9fc3ce99b34 ("libbpf: Streamline error reporting for high-level
APIs") redefined the way that bpf_prog_detach2() returns. Therefore, adapt
the usage in test_lirc_mode2_user.c.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo B. Marlière <rbm@...e.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lirc_mode2_user.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lirc_mode2_user.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lirc_mode2_user.c
index 4694422aa76c36faa4afa8832e56040547dc7547..88e4aeab21b7bc37665d6fd3959006c5a83a81c9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lirc_mode2_user.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lirc_mode2_user.c
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 
 	/* Let's try detach it before it was ever attached */
 	ret = bpf_prog_detach2(progfd, lircfd, BPF_LIRC_MODE2);
-	if (ret != -1 || errno != ENOENT) {
+	if (ret != -ENOENT) {
 		printf("bpf_prog_detach2 not attached should fail: %m\n");
 		return 1;
 	}

---
base-commit: 5b6d6fe1ca7b712c74f78426bb23c465fd34b322
change-id: 20250828-selftests-bpf-45ccf9c6e7d4

Best regards,
-- 
Ricardo B. Marlière <rbm@...e.com>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ