[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250828115158.46901da7@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 11:51:58 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Thomas
Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "H. Peter
Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next
Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Sean Christopherson
<seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the tip tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
between commit:
28d11e4548b7 ("x86/fred: KVM: VMX: Always use FRED for IRQs when CONFIG_X86_FRED=y")
from the tip tree and commit:
924121eebddc ("KVM: x86: Select TDX's KVM_GENERIC_xxx dependencies iff CONFIG_KVM_INTEL_TDX=y")
from the kvm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
index b92ef117f355,4e43923656d0..000000000000
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig
@@@ -95,9 -96,6 +96,7 @@@ config KVM_SW_PROTECTED_V
config KVM_INTEL
tristate "KVM for Intel (and compatible) processors support"
depends on KVM && IA32_FEAT_CTL
- select KVM_GENERIC_PRIVATE_MEM if INTEL_TDX_HOST
- select KVM_GENERIC_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES if INTEL_TDX_HOST
+ select X86_FRED if X86_64
help
Provides support for KVM on processors equipped with Intel's VT
extensions, a.k.a. Virtual Machine Extensions (VMX).
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists