[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53b938ed-dd78-42fa-8cde-f3a938b6f39f@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 16:21:05 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@...e.de>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "open list:MEMORY MAPPING" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mremap: fix regression in vrm->new_addr check
On 8/28/25 07:38, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 03:26:52AM +0000, Carlos Llamas wrote:
>> Commit 3215eaceca87 ("mm/mremap: refactor initial parameter sanity
>> checks") moved the sanity check for vrm->new_addr from mremap_to() to
>> check_mremap_params().
>>
>> However, this caused a regression as vrm->new_addr is now checked even
>> when MREMAP_FIXED and MREMAP_DONTUNMAP flags are not specified. In this
>> case, vrm->new_addr can be garbage and create unexpected failures.
>
> Yikes, sorry my mistake.
>
>>
>> Fix this by moving the new_addr check after the vrm_implies_new_addr()
>> guard. This ensures that the new_addr is only checked when the user has
>> specified one explicitly.
>>
>> Fixes: 3215eaceca87 ("mm/mremap: refactor initial parameter sanity checks")
>> Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>
>
> You need a Cc: Stable.
No need as the commit being fixed is from 6.17-rc1?
But it's better to use "[PATCH mm-hotfixes]" to make sure it goes to 6.17
and not the next merge window.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists