[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68b06f9131be5_211482942e@iweiny-mobl.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 10:02:41 -0500
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini
<pbonzini@...hat.com>
CC: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Michael Roth
<michael.roth@....com>, Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>, Ira Weiny
<ira.weiny@...el.com>, Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>, "Rick
Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/12] KVM: TDX: Avoid a double-KVM_BUG_ON() in
tdx_sept_zap_private_spte()
Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Return -EIO immediately from tdx_sept_zap_private_spte() if the number of
> to-be-added pages underflows, so that the following "KVM_BUG_ON(err, kvm)"
> isn't also triggered. Isolating the check from the "is premap error"
> if-statement will also allow adding a lockdep assertion that premap errors
> are encountered if and only if slots_lock is held.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> index ef4ffcad131f..88079e2d45fb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> @@ -1773,8 +1773,10 @@ static int tdx_sept_zap_private_spte(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
> err = tdh_mem_range_block(&kvm_tdx->td, gpa, tdx_level, &entry, &level_state);
> tdx_no_vcpus_enter_stop(kvm);
> }
> - if (tdx_is_sept_zap_err_due_to_premap(kvm_tdx, err, entry, level) &&
> - !KVM_BUG_ON(!atomic64_read(&kvm_tdx->nr_premapped), kvm)) {
> + if (tdx_is_sept_zap_err_due_to_premap(kvm_tdx, err, entry, level)) {
> + if (KVM_BUG_ON(!atomic64_read(&kvm_tdx->nr_premapped), kvm))
> + return -EIO;
Won't this -EIO cause the KVM_BUG_ON on in remove_external_spte() to fire too?
static void remove_external_spte(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn, u64 old_spte,
int level)
{
...
ret = kvm_x86_call(remove_external_spte)(kvm, gfn, level, old_pfn);
KVM_BUG_ON(ret, kvm);
}
This patch is better than 3 bug ons but wouldn't it be better to make both
KVM_BUG_ON's internal errors or debug?
Something like this:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
index 4920ee8ad773..83065f3fe605 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
@@ -1774,14 +1774,16 @@ static int tdx_sept_zap_private_spte(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
tdx_no_vcpus_enter_stop(kvm);
}
if (tdx_is_sept_zap_err_due_to_premap(kvm_tdx, err, entry, level)) {
- if (KVM_BUG_ON(!atomic64_read(&kvm_tdx->nr_premapped), kvm))
+ if (!atomic64_read(&kvm_tdx->nr_premapped)) {
+ pr_err("nr_premapped underflow\n");
return -EIO;
+ }
atomic64_dec(&kvm_tdx->nr_premapped);
return 0;
}
- if (KVM_BUG_ON(err, kvm)) {
+ if (err) {
pr_tdx_error_2(TDH_MEM_RANGE_BLOCK, err, entry, level_state);
return -EIO;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists