[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <133e0b4b-1f3c-4a62-9876-f191f0befd46@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 11:25:04 -0400
From: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>
To: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: maple-tree@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] maple_tree: Testing fix for spanning store on 32b
On 8/27/25 8:30 PM, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> 32 bit nodes have a larger branching factor. This affects the required
> value to cause a height change. Update the spanning store height test
> to work for both 64 and 32 bit nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>
Fixes: f9d3a963fef4 ("maple_tree: use height and depth consistently")
Reviewed-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>> ---
> tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c b/tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c
> index 90a0db45a33c3..05714c22994ea 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/radix-tree/maple.c
> @@ -36327,13 +36327,18 @@ extern void test_kmem_cache_bulk(void);
> static inline void check_spanning_store_height(struct maple_tree *mt)
> {
> int index = 0;
> + int last = 140;
> MA_STATE(mas, mt, 0, 0);
> mas_lock(&mas);
> while (mt_height(mt) != 3) {
> mas_store_gfp(&mas, xa_mk_value(index), GFP_KERNEL);
> mas_set(&mas, ++index);
> }
> - mas_set_range(&mas, 90, 140);
> +
> + if (MAPLE_32BIT)
> + last = 155; /* 32 bit higher branching factor. */
> +
> + mas_set_range(&mas, 90, last);
> mas_store_gfp(&mas, xa_mk_value(index), GFP_KERNEL);
> MT_BUG_ON(mt, mas_mt_height(&mas) != 2);
> mas_unlock(&mas);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists