[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5bb98ec3-f918-455e-9f13-71eb0506ad6c@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 16:57:44 +0100
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Amit Singh Tomar <amitsinght@...vell.com>,
Baisheng Gao <baisheng.gao@...soc.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, bobo.shaobowang@...wei.com,
Carl Worth <carl@...amperecomputing.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Drew Fustini <dfustini@...libre.com>,
D Scott Phillips <scott@...amperecomputing.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@...dia.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, Koba Ko <kobak@...dia.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
<rafael@...nel.org>, Rex Nie <rex.nie@...uarmicro.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@....com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>, Sudeep Holla
<sudeep.holla@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Xin Hao <xhao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/33] ACPI / PPTT: Find cache level by cache-id
Hi Markus,
On 23/08/2025 13:14, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
>> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> …
>> @@ -221,6 +222,17 @@ void acpi_reserve_initial_tables (void);
>> void acpi_table_init_complete (void);
>> int acpi_table_init (void);
> …
>> +DEFINE_FREE(acpi_table, struct acpi_table_header *, if (!IS_ERR(_T)) acpi_put_table(_T))
>> +
>> int acpi_table_parse(char *id, acpi_tbl_table_handler handler);
> …
>
> How do you think about to offer the addition of such a special macro call
> by another separate update step?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.17-rc2#n81
As it goes via the same tree I don't think there is a strong reason either way.
Dave points out on an earlier patch that the PPTT code doesn't care about the reference
counting anyway, so this stuff can go.
Thanks,
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists