[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLCTPVUQwr+Sc7Wz@visitorckw-System-Product-Name>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 01:34:53 +0800
From: Kuan-Wei Chiu <visitorckw@...il.com>
To: Guan-Chun Wu <409411716@....tku.edu.tw>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btree: simplify merge logic by using btree_last()
return value
Hi Guan-Chun,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:17:41AM +0800, Guan-Chun Wu wrote:
> Previously btree_merge() called btree_last() only to test existence,
> then performed an extra btree_lookup() to fetch the value. This patch
> changes it to directly use the value returned by btree_last(), avoiding
> redundant lookups and simplifying the merge loop.
>
> v2:
> - Update subject to clarify this is a simplification, not a bug fix
For future reference, please put version-to-version changelogs
(e.g. v1 -> v2 notes) between --- and the diffstat. [1] That way they
are not recorded in the permanent commit message but still visible
during review.
[1]: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.12/process/submitting-patches.html#the-canonical-patch-format
Regards,
Kuan-Wei
>
> Signed-off-by: Guan-Chun Wu <409411716@....tku.edu.tw>
> ---
> lib/btree.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/btree.c b/lib/btree.c
> index bb81d3393ac5..9c80c0c7bba8 100644
> --- a/lib/btree.c
> +++ b/lib/btree.c
> @@ -653,9 +653,9 @@ int btree_merge(struct btree_head *target, struct btree_head *victim,
> * walks to remove a single object from the victim.
> */
> for (;;) {
> - if (!btree_last(victim, geo, key))
> + val = btree_last(victim, geo, key);
> + if (!val)
> break;
> - val = btree_lookup(victim, geo, key);
> err = btree_insert(target, geo, key, val, gfp);
> if (err)
> return err;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists