linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] power: supply: bq27xxx: bug fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250828202421.57bbbd2c@akair>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 20:24:21 +0200
From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, Jerry Lv <Jerry.Lv@...s.com>, Pali
 Rohár <pali@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org,
 stable@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...a-handheld.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] power: supply: bq27xxx: bug fixes

Am Sat, 23 Aug 2025 12:34:55 +0200
schrieb "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>:

> PATCH V2 2025-08-23 12:33:18:
> Changes:
> * improved commit description of main fix
> * new patch: adds a restriction of historical no-battery-detection logic to the bq27000 chip
> 
> PATCH V1 2025-07-21 14:46:09:
> 
> 
> H. Nikolaus Schaller (2):
>   power: supply: bq27xxx: fix error return in case of no bq27000 hdq
>     battery
>   power: supply: bq27xxx: restrict no-battery detection to bq27000
> 
hmm, is the order correct? To me to be bisectable, should it be turned
around? Maybe Sebastian just can do that while picking it.

Regards,
Andreas