[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250828203935.c46twi4r7qktxaco@skbuf>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 23:39:35 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Schirm <andreas.schirm@...mens.com>,
Lukas Stockmann <lukas.stockmann@...mens.com>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...mens.com>,
Peter Christen <peter.christen@...mens.com>,
Avinash Jayaraman <ajayaraman@...linear.com>,
Bing tao Xu <bxu@...linear.com>, Liang Xu <lxu@...linear.com>,
Juraj Povazanec <jpovazanec@...linear.com>,
"Fanni (Fang-Yi) Chan" <fchan@...linear.com>,
"Benny (Ying-Tsan) Weng" <yweng@...linear.com>,
"Livia M. Rosu" <lrosu@...linear.com>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] net: dsa: lantiq_gswip: ignore SerDes
modes in phylink_mac_config()
On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 12:06:03AM +0100, Daniel Golle wrote:
> We can safely ignore SerDes interface modes 1000Base-X, 2500Base-X and
> SGMII in phylink_mac_config() as they are being taken care of by the
> PCS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
> ---
> v2: no changes
>
> drivers/net/dsa/lantiq/lantiq_gswip.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq/lantiq_gswip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq/lantiq_gswip.c
> index acb6996356e9..3e2a54569828 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq/lantiq_gswip.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/lantiq/lantiq_gswip.c
> @@ -1444,6 +1444,10 @@ static void gswip_phylink_mac_config(struct phylink_config *config,
> miicfg |= GSWIP_MII_CFG_LDCLKDIS;
>
> switch (state->interface) {
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII:
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_1000BASEX:
> + case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_2500BASEX:
> + return;
> case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII:
> case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_INTERNAL:
> miicfg |= GSWIP_MII_CFG_MODE_MIIM;
> --
> 2.51.0
Is "miicfg" irrelevant in these 3 modes? Doesn't it have to be set to
GSWIP_MII_CFG_MODE_GMII?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists