[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c4c5095-d292-406a-84fd-23e178f1295e@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 11:20:21 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: wangzijie <wangzijie1@...or.com>, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc: chao@...nel.org, feng.han@...or.com, jaegeuk@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: reduce nat_tree_lock hold time when
flush nat entries
On 8/26/25 09:44, wangzijie wrote:
>> On 8/13/25 12:04, wangzijie wrote:
>>> Sometimes I suffered the nat_tree_lock contention between f2fs_write_checkpoint
>>> and f2fs_get_node_info. Commit a9419b6("f2fs: do not bother checkpoint by
>>> f2fs_get_node_info") also mentioned that situation.
>>>
>>> My idea is, when flush nat entries, we can use some structures to record nat
>>> pages we may read, and readahead them before hold nat_tree_lock. Before
>>> impletement code, I did some survey and found a submittion in community.
>>>
>>> Subject: f2fs: use bucket sort to avoid tree lookup and list sort when nat flushing
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20170520122435.17574-2-houpengyang@huawei.com/
>>> This patch aims to improve nat entry set sort by using bucket.
>>> I steal that structure and readahead nat pages contain nat entry set which cannot be moved
>>> to journal according to dirty nat entry set bucket.
>>>
>>> By doing this, I think there are two benefits to reducing nat_tree_lock hold time when
>>> when flush nat entries.
>>
>> Zijie,
>>
>> Can you please figure out some numbers for this patch? something like
>> checkpoint latency or average or extreme time to grab nat_tree_lock...?
>>
>>> 1. avoid nat set tree lookup and sort
>>> 2. readahead nat pages before holding nat_tree_lock
>>
>> It may cause performance regression if it races w/ drop_caches?
>>
>> Thanks,
>
> Hi, Chao
> Do you mean that it will race with f2fs_try_to_free_nats()?
No, I meant get_current_nat_folio() readahead may race with memory reclaim? e.g.
all uptodate nat pages are reclaimed before late updates? Seems a corner case.
Thanks,
> In this patch, nat_tree_lock is not held when readahead nat pages, but
> in fact we need it. Am I right?
>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: wangzijie <wangzijie1@...or.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
>>> fs/f2fs/node.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>>> fs/f2fs/node.h | 2 +-
>>> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> index 46be75605..b27cc059f 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>>> @@ -975,6 +975,7 @@ struct f2fs_nm_info {
>>> struct radix_tree_root nat_set_root;/* root of the nat set cache */
>>> struct f2fs_rwsem nat_tree_lock; /* protect nat entry tree */
>>> struct list_head nat_entries; /* cached nat entry list (clean) */
>>> + struct list_head nat_dirty_set[NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK + 1]; /* store dirty nat set */
>>> spinlock_t nat_list_lock; /* protect clean nat entry list */
>>> unsigned int nat_cnt[MAX_NAT_STATE]; /* the # of cached nat entries */
>>> unsigned int nat_blocks; /* # of nat blocks */
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>> index 27743b93e..87c975ee8 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>> @@ -244,6 +244,12 @@ static void __del_from_nat_cache(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i, struct nat_entry *e)
>>> __free_nat_entry(e);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static void __relocate_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
>>> + struct nat_entry_set *set)
>>> +{
>>> + list_move_tail(&set->set_list, &nm_i->nat_dirty_set[set->entry_cnt]);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static struct nat_entry_set *__grab_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
>>> struct nat_entry *ne)
>>> {
>>> @@ -260,6 +266,7 @@ static struct nat_entry_set *__grab_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
>>> head->set = set;
>>> head->entry_cnt = 0;
>>> f2fs_radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->nat_set_root, set, head);
>>> + __relocate_nat_entry_set(nm_i, head);
>>> }
>>> return head;
>>> }
>>> @@ -279,8 +286,10 @@ static void __set_nat_cache_dirty(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
>>> * 2. update old block address to new one;
>>> */
>>> if (!new_ne && (get_nat_flag(ne, IS_PREALLOC) ||
>>> - !get_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY)))
>>> + !get_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY))) {
>>> head->entry_cnt++;
>>> + __relocate_nat_entry_set(nm_i, head);
>>> + }
>>>
>>> set_nat_flag(ne, IS_PREALLOC, new_ne);
>>>
>>> @@ -309,6 +318,7 @@ static void __clear_nat_cache_dirty(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
>>>
>>> set_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY, false);
>>> set->entry_cnt--;
>>> + __relocate_nat_entry_set(nm_i, set);
>>> nm_i->nat_cnt[DIRTY_NAT]--;
>>> nm_i->nat_cnt[RECLAIMABLE_NAT]++;
>>> }
>>> @@ -2976,24 +2986,6 @@ static void remove_nats_in_journal(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>> up_write(&curseg->journal_rwsem);
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static void __adjust_nat_entry_set(struct nat_entry_set *nes,
>>> - struct list_head *head, int max)
>>> -{
>>> - struct nat_entry_set *cur;
>>> -
>>> - if (nes->entry_cnt >= max)
>>> - goto add_out;
>>> -
>>> - list_for_each_entry(cur, head, set_list) {
>>> - if (cur->entry_cnt >= nes->entry_cnt) {
>>> - list_add(&nes->set_list, cur->set_list.prev);
>>> - return;
>>> - }
>>> - }
>>> -add_out:
>>> - list_add_tail(&nes->set_list, head);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> static void __update_nat_bits(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t start_nid,
>>> const struct f2fs_nat_block *nat_blk)
>>> {
>>> @@ -3095,6 +3087,7 @@ static int __flush_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>>
>>> /* Allow dirty nats by node block allocation in write_begin */
>>> if (!set->entry_cnt) {
>>> + list_del(&set->set_list);
>>> radix_tree_delete(&NM_I(sbi)->nat_set_root, set->set);
>>> kmem_cache_free(nat_entry_set_slab, set);
>>> }
>>> @@ -3109,11 +3102,8 @@ int f2fs_flush_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>>> struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
>>> struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, CURSEG_HOT_DATA);
>>> struct f2fs_journal *journal = curseg->journal;
>>> - struct nat_entry_set *setvec[NAT_VEC_SIZE];
>>> struct nat_entry_set *set, *tmp;
>>> - unsigned int found;
>>> - nid_t set_idx = 0;
>>> - LIST_HEAD(sets);
>>> + int i;
>>> int err = 0;
>>>
>>> /*
>>> @@ -3129,6 +3119,16 @@ int f2fs_flush_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>>> if (!nm_i->nat_cnt[DIRTY_NAT])
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> + /* readahead sets which cannot be moved to journal */
>>> + if (!__has_cursum_space(journal, nm_i->nat_cnt[DIRTY_NAT], NAT_JOURNAL)) {
>>> + for (i = MAX_NAT_JENTRIES(journal); i <= NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK; i++) {
>>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(set, tmp, &nm_i->nat_dirty_set[i], set_list) {
>>> + f2fs_ra_meta_pages(sbi, set->set, 1,
>>> + META_NAT, true);
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> f2fs_down_write(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
>>>
>>> /*
>>> @@ -3141,21 +3141,13 @@ int f2fs_flush_nat_entries(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>>> nm_i->nat_cnt[DIRTY_NAT], NAT_JOURNAL))
>>> remove_nats_in_journal(sbi);
>>>
>>> - while ((found = __gang_lookup_nat_set(nm_i,
>>> - set_idx, NAT_VEC_SIZE, setvec))) {
>>> - unsigned idx;
>>> -
>>> - set_idx = setvec[found - 1]->set + 1;
>>> - for (idx = 0; idx < found; idx++)
>>> - __adjust_nat_entry_set(setvec[idx], &sets,
>>> - MAX_NAT_JENTRIES(journal));
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> /* flush dirty nats in nat entry set */
>>> - list_for_each_entry_safe(set, tmp, &sets, set_list) {
>>> - err = __flush_nat_entry_set(sbi, set, cpc);
>>> - if (err)
>>> - break;
>>> + for (i = 0; i <= NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK; i++) {
>>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(set, tmp, &nm_i->nat_dirty_set[i], set_list) {
>>> + err = __flush_nat_entry_set(sbi, set, cpc);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>>
>>> f2fs_up_write(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
>>> @@ -3249,6 +3241,7 @@ static int init_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>> struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
>>> unsigned char *version_bitmap;
>>> unsigned int nat_segs;
>>> + int i;
>>> int err;
>>>
>>> nm_i->nat_blkaddr = le32_to_cpu(sb_raw->nat_blkaddr);
>>> @@ -3275,6 +3268,9 @@ static int init_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nm_i->nat_entries);
>>> spin_lock_init(&nm_i->nat_list_lock);
>>>
>>> + for (i = 0; i <= NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK; i++)
>>> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nm_i->nat_dirty_set[i]);
>>> +
>>> mutex_init(&nm_i->build_lock);
>>> spin_lock_init(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
>>> init_f2fs_rwsem(&nm_i->nat_tree_lock);
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.h b/fs/f2fs/node.h
>>> index 030390543..d805d4ce7 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.h
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.h
>>> @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ enum mem_type {
>>> };
>>>
>>> struct nat_entry_set {
>>> - struct list_head set_list; /* link with other nat sets */
>>> + struct list_head set_list; /* link with nat sets which have same entry_cnt */
>>> struct list_head entry_list; /* link with dirty nat entries */
>>> nid_t set; /* set number*/
>>> unsigned int entry_cnt; /* the # of nat entries in set */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists