[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGnOC3YsE3p4JA0=mswVHhEC_AK3PMSpPRcLCe5HYY3RDJKUUA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 08:55:06 +0200
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...gle.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@...gle.com>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@....com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 21/22] x86/boot: Move startup code out of __head section
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 8:50 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Aug 2025 at 19:17, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/11/25 14:03, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 01:05:42PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > >> Yes, that works. Or just get rid of snp_abort() and call
> > >> sev_es_terminate() directly. Secure AVIC could even use an
> > >> SEV_TERM_SET_LINUX specific code instead of the generic failure code.
> > >
> > > I *love* deleting code. Here's something to start the debate:
> > >
> > > ---
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/startup/sev-startup.c b/arch/x86/boot/startup/sev-startup.c
> > > index 7a8128dc076e..19b23e6d2dbe 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/boot/startup/sev-startup.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/boot/startup/sev-startup.c
> > > @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static struct cc_blob_sev_info *__init find_cc_blob(struct boot_params *bp)
> > >
> > > found_cc_info:
> > > if (cc_info->magic != CC_BLOB_SEV_HDR_MAGIC)
> > > - snp_abort();
> > > + sev_es_terminate(SEV_TERM_SET_GEN, GHCB_SNP_UNSUPPORTED);
> > >
> > > return cc_info;
> > > }
> > > @@ -209,8 +209,3 @@ bool __init snp_init(struct boot_params *bp)
> > >
> > > return true;
> > > }
> > > -
> > > -void __init __noreturn snp_abort(void)
> > > -{
> > > - sev_es_terminate(SEV_TERM_SET_GEN, GHCB_SNP_UNSUPPORTED);
> > > -}
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/startup/sme.c b/arch/x86/boot/startup/sme.c
> > > index 39e7e9d18974..e389b39fa2a9 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/boot/startup/sme.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/boot/startup/sme.c
> > > @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ void __init sme_enable(struct boot_params *bp)
> > > * enablement abort the guest.
> > > */
> > > if (snp_en ^ !!(msr & MSR_AMD64_SEV_SNP_ENABLED))
> > > - snp_abort();
> > > + sev_es_terminate(SEV_TERM_SET_GEN, GHCB_SNP_UNSUPPORTED);
> > >
> > > /* Check if memory encryption is enabled */
> > > if (feature_mask == AMD_SME_BIT) {
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h
> > > index 0020d77a0800..01a6e4dbe423 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h
> > > @@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ struct snp_psc_desc {
> > > #define GHCB_TERM_SVSM_CAA 9 /* SVSM is present but CAA is not page aligned */
> > > #define GHCB_TERM_SECURE_TSC 10 /* Secure TSC initialization failed */
> > > #define GHCB_TERM_SVSM_CA_REMAP_FAIL 11 /* SVSM is present but CA could not be remapped */
> > > +#define GHCB_TERM_SAVIC_FAIL 12 /* Secure AVIC-specific failure */
> >
> > We can get specific if desired, e.g., GHCB_TERM_SAVIC_NO_X2APIC
> >
>
> I'll fold this in for the next revision, and we can take it from there.
Actually, it does not appear to be in tip/master yet so I am going to
ignore it for now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists