[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <601863349f71b54087bc7ffa382955ad6bbf5511.camel@xry111.site>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 15:11:57 +0800
From: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Wentao Guan
<guanwentao@...ontech.com>
Cc: WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>, linux-kernel
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, loongarch <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
占俊 <zhanjun@...ontech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Loongarch: entry: fix syscall_get_arguments() VS
no-bultin-memcpy
On Thu, 2025-08-28 at 15:09 +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 3:06 PM Wentao Guan <guanwentao@...ontech.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Ruoyao,
> >
> > Thanks for your review.
> > I will test and send test results later.
> > (use different gcc verions and remove the three flags.)
> I think kernel's memcpy is still needed for CPUs without UAL.
GCC memcpy expansion correctly understands no-UAL case. It won't
generate unaligned access unless -mno-strict-align.
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...111.site>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists