[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250828073311.1116593-13-wangjinchao600@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 15:32:45 +0800
From: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen@...nel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/17] mm/ksw: add test module
Introduce a separate test module to validate KStackWatch functionality in
controlled scenarios, such as stack canary writes and simulated corruption.
The module provides a proc interface (/proc/kstackwatch_test) that allows
triggering specific test cases via simple commands:
- test0: directly corrupt the canary to verify watch/fire behavior
This helps development and validation of KStackWatch without affecting
normal kernel operation. Test module is built with optimizations disabled
to ensure predictable behavior.
Signed-off-by: Jinchao Wang <wangjinchao600@...il.com>
---
mm/Kconfig.debug | 10 +++
mm/kstackwatch/Makefile | 6 +-
mm/kstackwatch/kstackwatch_test.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 mm/kstackwatch/kstackwatch_test.c
diff --git a/mm/Kconfig.debug b/mm/Kconfig.debug
index c2cc8c7b595f..7fdf7b03d458 100644
--- a/mm/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/mm/Kconfig.debug
@@ -319,3 +319,13 @@ config KSTACK_WATCH
the recursive depth of the monitored function.
If unsure, say N.
+
+config KSTACK_WATCH_TEST
+ tristate "KStackWatch Test Module"
+ depends on KSTACK_WATCH
+ help
+ This module provides controlled stack exhaustion and overflow scenarios
+ to verify the functionality of KStackWatch. It is particularly useful
+ for development and validation of the KStachWatch mechanism.
+
+ If unsure, say N.
diff --git a/mm/kstackwatch/Makefile b/mm/kstackwatch/Makefile
index d422f0e114dd..c04c0780da01 100644
--- a/mm/kstackwatch/Makefile
+++ b/mm/kstackwatch/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,8 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_KSTACK_WATCH) += kstackwatch.o
kstackwatch-y := kernel.o stack.o watch.o
-CFLAGS_kernel.o := -Wno-error=unused-function
+obj-$(CONFIG_KSTACK_WATCH_TEST) += kstackwatch_test.o
+CFLAGS_kstackwatch_test.o := -fno-ipa-sra -fno-inline \
+ -fno-optimize-sibling-calls \
+ -fno-section-anchors \
+ -fno-pic -fno-pie -O0 -Og
diff --git a/mm/kstackwatch/kstackwatch_test.c b/mm/kstackwatch/kstackwatch_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..bba2ab8530ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mm/kstackwatch/kstackwatch_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/kthread.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/prandom.h>
+#include <linux/printk.h>
+#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
+#include <linux/random.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
+#include <linux/string.h>
+#include <linux/uaccess.h>
+
+#include "kstackwatch.h"
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Jinchao Wang");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Simple KStackWatch Test Module");
+
+static struct proc_dir_entry *test_proc;
+#define BUFFER_SIZE 4
+#define MAX_DEPTH 4
+
+/*
+ * Test Case 0: Write to the canary position directly (Canary Test)
+ * use a u64 buffer array to ensure the canary will be placed
+ * corrupt the stack canary using the debug function
+ */
+static void canary_test_write(void)
+{
+ u64 buffer[BUFFER_SIZE];
+
+ pr_info("KSW: test: starting %s with u64 write\n", __func__);
+ ksw_watch_show();
+ ksw_watch_fire();
+
+ buffer[0] = 0;
+
+ /* make sure the compiler do not drop assign action */
+ barrier_data(buffer);
+ pr_info("KSW: test: canary write test completed\n");
+}
+
+static ssize_t test_proc_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buffer,
+ size_t count, loff_t *pos)
+{
+ char cmd[256];
+ int test_num;
+
+ if (count >= sizeof(cmd))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (copy_from_user(cmd, buffer, count))
+ return -EFAULT;
+
+ cmd[count] = '\0';
+ strim(cmd);
+
+ pr_info("KSW: test: received command: %s\n", cmd);
+
+ if (sscanf(cmd, "test%d", &test_num) == 1) {
+ switch (test_num) {
+ case 0:
+ pr_info("KSW: test: triggering canary write test\n");
+ canary_test_write();
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ pr_err("KSW: test: Unknown test number %d\n", test_num);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ } else {
+ pr_err("KSW: test: invalid command format. Use 'test1', 'test2', or 'test3'.\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return count;
+}
+
+static ssize_t test_proc_read(struct file *file, char __user *buffer,
+ size_t count, loff_t *pos)
+{
+ static const char usage[] =
+ "KStackWatch Simplified Test Module\n"
+ "==================================\n"
+ "Usage:\n"
+ " echo 'test0' > /proc/kstackwatch_test - canary write test\n";
+
+ return simple_read_from_buffer(buffer, count, pos, usage,
+ strlen(usage));
+}
+
+static const struct proc_ops test_proc_ops = {
+ .proc_read = test_proc_read,
+ .proc_write = test_proc_write,
+};
+
+static int __init kstackwatch_test_init(void)
+{
+ test_proc = proc_create("kstackwatch_test", 0644, NULL, &test_proc_ops);
+ if (!test_proc) {
+ pr_err("KSW: test: Failed to create proc entry\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ pr_info("KSW: test: Module loaded, use 'cat /proc/kstackwatch_test' for usage\n");
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void __exit kstackwatch_test_exit(void)
+{
+ if (test_proc)
+ remove_proc_entry("kstackwatch_test", NULL);
+ pr_info("KSW: test: Module unloaded\n");
+}
+
+module_init(kstackwatch_test_init);
+module_exit(kstackwatch_test_exit);
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists