lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLAkI1PosfK0wDKZ@mun-amitshah-l>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 11:40:51 +0200
From: Amit Shah <amit@...nel.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, amit.shah@....com,
	thomas.lendacky@....com, bp@...en8.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org,
	pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com, corbet@....net, mingo@...hat.com,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
	daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com, kai.huang@...el.com,
	sandipan.das@....com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
	Babu.Moger@....com, david.kaplan@....com, dwmw@...zon.co.uk,
	andrew.cooper3@...rix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] x86: kvm: svm: set up ERAPS support for guests

On (Wed) 20 Aug 2025 [10:10:16], Sean Christopherson wrote:

[...]

> > +	if (tdp_enabled)
> > +		kvm_cpu_cap_check_and_set(X86_FEATURE_ERAPS);
> 
> _If_ ERAPS is conditionally enabled, then it probably makes sense to do this in
> svm_set_cpu_caps().  But I think we can just support ERAPS unconditionally.

[...]

> @@ -2560,6 +2563,8 @@ static int cr_interception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  			break;
>  		case 3:
>  			err = kvm_set_cr3(vcpu, val);
> +			if (!err && nested && kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ERAPS))
> +				svm->vmcb->control.erap_ctl |= ERAP_CONTROL_FLUSH_RAP;

I missed this part in my reply earlier.

Enabling ERAPS for a guest is trickier in the no-NPT case: *if* the guest is
enlightened, notices the CPUID for ERAPS, and drops the mitigations, KVM needs
to ensure the FLUSH_RAP bit is set in the VMCB on guest CR3 changes all the
time.  Your change adds it - but only for the nested case.  It needs to do it
for the non-nested case as well.

I steered away from enabling it in the !npt case in the first place because it
was such a niche configuration that wasn't worth bothering and getting right
-- but since you've added it here, I'll go with it and drop the '&& nested'
part of the hunk above.

     	Amit

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ