[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3386797.aeNJFYEL58@rafael.j.wysocki>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 13:03:13 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Armin Wolf <w_armin@....de>
Subject:
[PATCH v1] ACPI: fan: Fold two simple functions into their only caller
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Both acpi_fan_has_fst() and acpi_fan_is_acpi4() are called from one
place only, so fold them both into there caller which yields slightly
leaner code that is somewhat easier to follow.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/acpi/fan_core.c | 18 ++++--------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/acpi/fan_core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/fan_core.c
@@ -203,18 +203,6 @@
* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
-static bool acpi_fan_has_fst(struct acpi_device *device)
-{
- return acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_FST");
-}
-
-static bool acpi_fan_is_acpi4(struct acpi_device *device)
-{
- return acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_FIF") &&
- acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_FPS") &&
- acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_FSL");
-}
-
static int acpi_fan_get_fif(struct acpi_device *device)
{
struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
@@ -331,9 +319,11 @@
device->driver_data = fan;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, fan);
- if (acpi_fan_has_fst(device)) {
+ if (acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_FST")) {
fan->has_fst = true;
- fan->acpi4 = acpi_fan_is_acpi4(device);
+ fan->acpi4 = acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_FIF") &&
+ acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_FPS") &&
+ acpi_has_method(device->handle, "_FSL");
}
if (fan->acpi4) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists