[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250828135109.1da8eac8@mordecai.tesarici.cz>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 13:51:09 +0200
From: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND
64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>, "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/tsx: Get the tsx= command line parameter with
core_param()
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 12:16:36 -0700
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 10:34:33AM +0200, Petr Tesarik wrote:
> > Use core_param() to get the value of the tsx= command line parameter.
> > Although cmdline_find_option() works fine, the option is reported as
> > unknown and passed to user space. The latter is not a real issue, but
> > the former is confusing and makes people wonder if the tsx= parameter
> > had any effect and double-check for typos unnecessarily.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
Thank you, Pawan.
May I ask what is the status of this patch now?
Petr T
Powered by blists - more mailing lists