[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250829-nvme-fc-sync-v3-3-d69c87e63aee@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 17:37:27 +0200
From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...nel.org>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, James Smart <james.smart@...adcom.com>
Cc: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@....com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Wagner <wagi@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/4] nvme-fc: refactore nvme_fc_reconnect_or_delete
Instead using if else blocks, apply the 'early return' and 'goto out'
pattern. This reduces the overall complexity of this function as the
conditions can be read in a linear order.
The only function change is that always the next reconnect attempt
message will be printed.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@...nel.org>
---
drivers/nvme/host/fc.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
index 3e6c79bf0bfd3884867c9ebeb24771323a619934..5d9e193bd2525ae1a2f08e2a0a16ca41e08a7304 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
@@ -3249,7 +3249,6 @@ nvme_fc_reconnect_or_delete(struct nvme_fc_ctrl *ctrl, int status)
struct nvme_fc_rport *rport = ctrl->rport;
struct nvme_fc_remote_port *portptr = &rport->remoteport;
unsigned long recon_delay = ctrl->ctrl.opts->reconnect_delay * HZ;
- bool recon = true;
if (nvme_ctrl_state(&ctrl->ctrl) != NVME_CTRL_CONNECTING)
return;
@@ -3259,38 +3258,43 @@ nvme_fc_reconnect_or_delete(struct nvme_fc_ctrl *ctrl, int status)
"NVME-FC{%d}: reset: Reconnect attempt failed (%d)\n",
ctrl->cnum, status);
} else if (time_after_eq(jiffies, rport->dev_loss_end))
- recon = false;
+ goto delete_log;
- if (recon && nvmf_should_reconnect(&ctrl->ctrl, status)) {
- if (portptr->port_state == FC_OBJSTATE_ONLINE)
- dev_info(ctrl->ctrl.device,
- "NVME-FC{%d}: Reconnect attempt in %ld "
- "seconds\n",
- ctrl->cnum, recon_delay / HZ);
- else if (time_after(jiffies + recon_delay, rport->dev_loss_end))
- recon_delay = rport->dev_loss_end - jiffies;
+ if (!nvmf_should_reconnect(&ctrl->ctrl, status))
+ goto delete_log;
- queue_delayed_work(nvme_wq, &ctrl->connect_work, recon_delay);
- } else {
- if (portptr->port_state == FC_OBJSTATE_ONLINE) {
- if (status > 0 && (status & NVME_STATUS_DNR))
- dev_warn(ctrl->ctrl.device,
- "NVME-FC{%d}: reconnect failure\n",
- ctrl->cnum);
- else
- dev_warn(ctrl->ctrl.device,
- "NVME-FC{%d}: Max reconnect attempts "
- "(%d) reached.\n",
- ctrl->cnum, ctrl->ctrl.nr_reconnects);
- } else
+ if (portptr->port_state != FC_OBJSTATE_ONLINE &&
+ time_after(jiffies + recon_delay, rport->dev_loss_end))
+ recon_delay = rport->dev_loss_end - jiffies;
+
+ dev_info(ctrl->ctrl.device,
+ "NVME-FC{%d}: Reconnect attempt in %ld seconds\n",
+ ctrl->cnum, recon_delay / HZ);
+
+ queue_delayed_work(nvme_wq, &ctrl->connect_work, recon_delay);
+
+ return;
+
+delete_log:
+ if (portptr->port_state == FC_OBJSTATE_ONLINE) {
+ if (status > 0 && (status & NVME_STATUS_DNR))
dev_warn(ctrl->ctrl.device,
- "NVME-FC{%d}: dev_loss_tmo (%d) expired "
- "while waiting for remoteport connectivity.\n",
- ctrl->cnum, min_t(int, portptr->dev_loss_tmo,
- (ctrl->ctrl.opts->max_reconnects *
- ctrl->ctrl.opts->reconnect_delay)));
- nvme_fc_ctrl_put(ctrl);
- }
+ "NVME-FC{%d}: reconnect failure\n",
+ ctrl->cnum);
+ else
+ dev_warn(ctrl->ctrl.device,
+ "NVME-FC{%d}: Max reconnect attempts "
+ "(%d) reached.\n",
+ ctrl->cnum, ctrl->ctrl.nr_reconnects);
+ } else
+ dev_warn(ctrl->ctrl.device,
+ "NVME-FC{%d}: dev_loss_tmo (%d) expired "
+ "while waiting for remoteport connectivity.\n",
+ ctrl->cnum, min_t(int, portptr->dev_loss_tmo,
+ (ctrl->ctrl.opts->max_reconnects *
+ ctrl->ctrl.opts->reconnect_delay)));
+
+ nvme_fc_ctrl_put(ctrl);
}
static void
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists