Message-ID: <20250829154814.47015-34-frederic@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 17:48:14 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 33/33] doc: Add housekeeping documentation

Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
---
 Documentation/cpu_isolation/housekeeping.rst | 111 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/cpu_isolation/housekeeping.rst

diff --git a/Documentation/cpu_isolation/housekeeping.rst b/Documentation/cpu_isolation/housekeeping.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e5417302774c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/cpu_isolation/housekeeping.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+======================================
+Housekeeping
+======================================
+
+
+CPU Isolation moves away kernel work that may otherwise run on any CPU.
+The purpose of its related features is to reduce the OS jitter that some
+extreme workloads can't stand, such as in some DPDK usecases.
+
+The kernel work moved away by CPU isolation is commonly described as
+"housekeeping" because it includes ground work that performs cleanups,
+statistics maintainance and actions relying on them, memory release,
+various deferrals etc...
+
+Sometimes housekeeping is just some unbound work (unbound workqueues,
+unbound timers, ...) that gets easily assigned to non-isolated CPUs.
+But sometimes housekeeping is tied to a specific CPU and requires
+elaborated tricks to be offloaded to non-isolated CPUs (RCU_NOCB, remote
+scheduler tick, etc...).
+
+Thus, a housekeeping CPU can be considered as the reverse of an isolated
+CPU. It is simply a CPU that can execute housekeeping work. There must
+always be at least one online housekeeping CPU at any time. The CPUs that
+are not	isolated are automatically assigned as housekeeping.
+
+Housekeeping is currently divided in four features described
+by the ``enum hk_type type``:
+
+1.	HK_TYPE_DOMAIN matches the work moved away by scheduler domain
+	isolation performed through ``isolcpus=domain`` boot parameter or
+	isolated cpuset partitions in cgroup v2. This includes scheduler
+	load balancing, unbound workqueues and timers.
+
+2.	HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE matches the work moved away by tick isolation
+	performed through ``nohz_full=`` or ``isolcpus=nohz`` boot
+	parameters. This includes remote scheduler tick, vmstat and lockup
+	watchdog.
+
+3.	HK_TYPE_MANAGED_IRQ matches the IRQ handlers moved away by managed
+	IRQ isolation performed through ``isolcpus=managed_irq``.
+
+4.	HK_TYPE_DOMAIN_BOOT matches the work moved away by scheduler domain
+	isolation performed through ``isolcpus=domain`` only. It is similar
+	to HK_TYPE_DOMAIN except it ignores the isolation performed by
+	cpusets.
+
+
+Housekeeping cpumasks
+=================================
+
+Housekeeping cpumasks include the CPUs that can execute the work moved
+away by the matching isolation feature. These cpumasks are returned by
+the following function::
+
+	const struct cpumask *housekeeping_cpumask(enum hk_type type)
+
+By default, if neither ``nohz_full=``, nor ``isolcpus``, nor cpuset's
+isolated partitions are used, which covers most usecases, this function
+returns the cpu_possible_mask.
+
+Otherwise the function returns the cpumask complement of the isolation
+feature. For example:
+
+With isolcpus=domain,7 the following will return a mask with all possible
+CPUs except 7::
+
+	housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN)
+
+Similarly with nohz_full=5,6 the following will return a mask with all
+possible CPUs except 5,6::
+
+	housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE)
+
+
+Synchronization against cpusets
+=================================
+
+Cpuset can modify the HK_TYPE_DOMAIN housekeeping cpumask while creating,
+modifying or deleting an isolated partition.
+
+The users of HK_TYPE_DOMAIN cpumask must then make sure to synchronize
+properly against cpuset in order to make sure that:
+
+1.	The cpumask snapshot stays coherent.
+
+2.	No housekeeping work is queued on a newly made isolated CPU.
+
+3.	Pending housekeeping work that was queued to a non isolated
+	CPU which just turned isolated through cpuset must be flushed
+	before the related created/modified isolated partition is made
+	available to userspace.
+
+This synchronization is maintained by an RCU based scheme. The cpuset update
+side waits for an RCU grace period after updating the HK_TYPE_DOMAIN
+cpumask and before flushing pending works. On the read side, care must be
+taken to gather the housekeeping target election and the work enqueue within
+the same RCU read side critical section.
+
+A typical layout example would look like this on the update side
+(``housekeeping_update()``)::
+
+	rcu_assign_pointer(housekeeping_cpumasks[type], trial);
+	synchronize_rcu();
+	flush_workqueue(example_workqueue);
+
+And then on the read side::
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	cpu = housekeeping_any_cpu(HK_TYPE_DOMAIN);
+	queue_work_on(cpu, example_workqueue, work);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
-- 
2.51.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists