linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V7 0/5] Add support for QCOM SPMI PMIC5 Gen3 ADC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250829173117.000029e6@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 17:31:17 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
CC: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Jishnu Prakash
	<jishnu.prakash@....qualcomm.com>, <jic23@...nel.org>, <robh@...nel.org>,
	<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
	<andersson@...nel.org>, <lumag@...nel.org>, <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
	<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, <sboyd@...nel.org>, <amitk@...nel.org>,
	<thara.gopinath@...il.com>, <lee@...nel.org>, <rafael@...nel.org>,
	<subbaraman.narayanamurthy@....qualcomm.com>,
	<david.collins@....qualcomm.com>, <anjelique.melendez@....qualcomm.com>,
	<kamal.wadhwa@....qualcomm.com>, <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	<lukasz.luba@....com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org>, <quic_kotarake@...cinc.com>,
	<neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, <stephan.gerhold@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/5] Add support for QCOM SPMI PMIC5 Gen3 ADC

On Fri, 29 Aug 2025 12:20:45 +0300
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 11:11:48AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 29/08/2025 10:09, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:  
> > > On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 09:12:59AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:  
> > >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 02:06:52PM +0530, Jishnu Prakash wrote:  
> > >>>  create mode 100644 drivers/iio/adc/qcom-spmi-adc5-gen3.c
> > >>>  create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5-gen3.c
> > >>>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/iio/adc/qcom,pm8550-adc5-gen3.h
> > >>>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/iio/adc/qcom,pm8550b-adc5-gen3.h
> > >>>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/iio/adc/qcom,pm8550vx-adc5-gen3.h
> > >>>  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/iio/adc/qcom,pmk8550-adc5-gen3.h
> > >>>  rename include/dt-bindings/iio/{ => adc}/qcom,spmi-adc7-pm7325.h (98%)
> > >>>  rename include/dt-bindings/iio/{ => adc}/qcom,spmi-adc7-pm8350.h (98%)
> > >>>  rename include/dt-bindings/iio/{ => adc}/qcom,spmi-adc7-pm8350b.h (99%)
> > >>>  rename include/dt-bindings/iio/{ => adc}/qcom,spmi-adc7-pmk8350.h (97%)
> > >>>  rename include/dt-bindings/iio/{ => adc}/qcom,spmi-adc7-pmr735a.h (95%)
> > >>>  rename include/dt-bindings/iio/{ => adc}/qcom,spmi-adc7-pmr735b.h (95%)
> > >>>  rename include/dt-bindings/iio/{ => adc}/qcom,spmi-adc7-smb139x.h (93%)
> > >>>  rename include/dt-bindings/iio/{ => adc}/qcom,spmi-vadc.h (78%)
> > >>>  create mode 100644 include/linux/iio/adc/qcom-adc5-gen3-common.h
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> base-commit: 0f4c93f7eb861acab537dbe94441817a270537bf  
> > >>
> > >> What's the base commit?
> > >>
> > >> git show 0f4c93f7eb861acab537dbe94441817a270537bf
> > >> fatal: bad object 0f4c93f7eb861acab537dbe94441817a270537bf  
> > > 
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20250822&id=0f4c93f7eb861acab537dbe94441817a270537bf  
> > 
> > I see:
> > "Notice: this object is not reachable from any branch."
> > 
> > I guess you think this is 20250822?  
> 
> Well, it kinda is. It's a commit by Stephen, it has proper contents,
> etc.  next-20250822 is not a branch, but a tag, that's why you observe
> the warning from gitweb. You can verify it yourself by manually pulling
> the tag from the repo.
> 

Kind of immaterial.  Typically subsystem maintainers want a base of
*-rc1 unless there is a dependency in their tree.

J