[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c76ab4d7-37aa-4d99-888d-e0762deb2342@broadcom.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 09:31:48 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
To: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"open list:MEMORY CONTROLLER DRIVERS" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] brcmstb-memc-ddr binding updates for MIPS boards
On 8/29/25 08:36, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 12:39:00PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 29/08/2025 12:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 29/08/2025 12:21, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 01:52:11PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>>>> This patch series updates the MIPS-based Broadcom STB chips to use a
>>>>> proper compatible string for their memory controller node(s) after
>>>>> 501be7cecec9 ("dt-bindings: memory-controller: Define fallback
>>>>> compatible").
>>>>>
>>>>> Florian Fainelli (2):
>>>>> dt-bindings: memory: Update brcmstb-memc-ddr binding with older chips
>>>>> MIPS: BMIPS: Properly define memory controller compatible
>>>>>
>>>>> .../bindings/memory-controllers/brcm,brcmstb-memc-ddr.yaml | 4 ++++
>>>>> arch/mips/boot/dts/brcm/bcm7346.dtsi | 3 ++-
>>>>> arch/mips/boot/dts/brcm/bcm7360.dtsi | 3 ++-
>>>>> arch/mips/boot/dts/brcm/bcm7362.dtsi | 3 ++-
>>>>> arch/mips/boot/dts/brcm/bcm7425.dtsi | 6 ++++--
>>>>> arch/mips/boot/dts/brcm/bcm7435.dtsi | 6 ++++--
>>>>> 6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> series applied to mips-next.
>>>
>>> Why entire series? You were notified two weeks ago that I already took
>>> the driver subsystem patch.
>
> I haven't got a mail in this thread from you about taking the first patch.
That is curious, it was in response to patch #1 and you were copied:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/175508140104.40429.8279921018476182386.b4-ty@linaro.org/
>
>> ...and you do not have even ack from memory-controllers for that patch.
>
> sorry, I'll drop the patch then.
Thanks!
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists