[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2606828.Sgy9Pd6rRy@senjougahara>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 09:18:22 +0900
From: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>, Aaron Kling <luceoscutum@...il.com>,
Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>, webgeek1234@...il.com
Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@...il.com>
Subject:
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: tegra186: Initialize all cores to max frequencies
On Friday, August 29, 2025 1:57 AM Aaron Kling via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@...il.com>
>
> During initialization, the EDVD_COREx_VOLT_FREQ registers for some cores
> are still at reset values and not reflecting the actual frequency. This
> causes get calls to fail. Set all cores to their respective max
> frequency during probe to initialize the registers to working values.
>
> Suggested-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Kling <webgeek1234@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/tegra186-cpufreq.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra186-cpufreq.c
> b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra186-cpufreq.c index
> 6c394b429b6182faffabf222e5af501393dbbba9..3cd42db955c1c705f9774879e34b71ae1
> 24e86d2 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra186-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra186-cpufreq.c
> @@ -138,7 +138,8 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver tegra186_cpufreq_driver = {
>
> static struct cpufreq_frequency_table *init_vhint_table(
> struct platform_device *pdev, struct tegra_bpmp *bpmp,
> - struct tegra186_cpufreq_cluster *cluster, unsigned int cluster_id)
> + struct tegra186_cpufreq_cluster *cluster, unsigned int cluster_id,
> + int *max_rate)
'max_rate' sounds like it's the rate itself and not the index. Perhaps have
init_vhint_table output num_rates and calculate in probe? We should also
handle the possibility of num_rates being 0. Otherwise looks good to me.
Thanks!
Mikko
> {
> struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table;
> struct mrq_cpu_vhint_request req;
> @@ -218,6 +219,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_frequency_table *init_vhint_table(
> }
>
> table[j].frequency = CPUFREQ_TABLE_END;
> + *max_rate = num_rates - 1;
>
> free:
> dma_free_coherent(bpmp->dev, sizeof(*data), virt, phys);
> @@ -229,7 +231,9 @@ static int tegra186_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev) {
> struct tegra186_cpufreq_data *data;
> struct tegra_bpmp *bpmp;
> - unsigned int i = 0, err;
> + unsigned int i = 0, err, edvd_offset;
> + int max_rate = 0;
> + u32 edvd_val, cpu;
>
> data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
> struct_size(data, clusters,
TEGRA186_NUM_CLUSTERS),
> @@ -252,11 +256,19 @@ static int tegra186_cpufreq_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev) for (i = 0; i < TEGRA186_NUM_CLUSTERS; i++) {
> struct tegra186_cpufreq_cluster *cluster = &data-
>clusters[i];
>
> - cluster->table = init_vhint_table(pdev, bpmp, cluster, i);
> + cluster->table = init_vhint_table(pdev, bpmp, cluster, i,
&max_rate);
> if (IS_ERR(cluster->table)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(cluster->table);
> goto put_bpmp;
> }
> +
> + for (cpu = 0; cpu < ARRAY_SIZE(tegra186_cpus); cpu++) {
> + if (data->cpus[cpu].bpmp_cluster_id == i) {
> + edvd_val = cluster-
>table[max_rate].driver_data;
> + edvd_offset = data->cpus[cpu].edvd_offset;
> + writel(edvd_val, data->regs +
edvd_offset);
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> tegra186_cpufreq_driver.driver_data = data;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists