lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250829-industrious-economic-jacamar-ce264d@kuoka>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 08:48:40 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Paul Chen <paul-pl.chen@...iatek.com>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	chunkuang.hu@...nel.org, angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com, 
	p.zabel@...gutronix.de, jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com, nancy.lin@...iatek.com, 
	singo.chang@...iatek.com, xiandong.wang@...iatek.com, sirius.wang@...iatek.com, 
	sunny.shen@...iatek.com, fshao@...omium.org, treapking@...omium.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/19] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: add EXDMA yaml
 for MT8196

On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 08:35:23AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 04:06:58PM +0800, Paul Chen wrote:
> > From: Paul-pl Chen <paul-pl.chen@...iatek.com>
> > 
> > Add mediatek,exdma.yaml to support EXDMA for MT8196.
> > The MediaTek display overlap extended DMA engine, namely
> > OVL_EXDMA or EXDMA, primarily functions as a DMA engine
> > for reading data from DRAM with various DRAM footprints
> > and data formats.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul-pl Chen <paul-pl.chen@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/dma/mediatek,exdma.yaml          | 68 +++++++++++++++++++
> 
> 
> Your changelog says NOTHING changed here and this fails tests, so does it
> mean you received that warnings before but you keep sending same broken
> code?
> 
> Last two weeks of contributions from mediatek are absolutely terrible.
> Very poor code, basic in-house reviews not done, basic testing not done.
> 
> I talked about this at OSSE 25 with some friends and got reasons why
> your setup is broken. Well, it's on you.
> 
> I was already raising this with Mediatek, but we are now back to square
> one.
> 
> NAK, because this patch WAS NEVER tested.


And now I found you got EXACTLY the same error at v3, so you just never
tested and ignored OUR test reports.

This is unfortunately an example how you waste reviewers' time.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ