linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] usb: storage: realtek_cr: Simplify residue calculation in rts51x_bulk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <7B58E620-723A-41D3-9EA2-81159009A818@linux.dev>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 09:10:00 +0200
From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
 linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
 usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] usb: storage: realtek_cr: Simplify residue
 calculation in rts51x_bulk_transport()

On 29. Aug 2025, at 06:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 06:26:24PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote:
>> Simplify the calculation of 'residue' in rts51x_bulk_transport() and
>> avoid unnecessarily reassigning 'residue' to itself.
>> 
>> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
>> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
>> ---
> Why is this a RESEND?  What happened to the first one?

This was patch 2/3 of a patch series that doesn't apply anymore because
you asked me to submit the bugfix in patch 3/3 separately [1].

Since the series doesn't apply anymore and patch 1/3 didn't get any
support [2], I figured it's best to resend this one as a separate patch.

Thanks,
Thorsten

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2025081358-posted-ritzy-bd3f@gregkh/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250813101249.158270-2-thorsten.blum@linux.dev/