linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] selftests/futex: Fix futex_numa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250829100705.GBaLF7ycOvksu9H6KN@fat_crate.local>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 12:07:05 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>, Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, kernel-dev@...lia.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/futex: Fix futex_numa_mpol's memory out of
 range subtest

On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 08:16:24AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > No objections merging Waiman fix first, but we are still in -rc3, so maybe
> > there's time for the rework in this cycle?

... and you can rework all you want. When your solution is ready and everyone
agrees, there's nothing wrong with queueing it ontop or delaying it for the
next merge window.

> On the regression list, we this one fallout in the testsuite. I would
> like to get an easy fix for -rc4 and be done with it for this cycle. 

There's absolutely no place for hurrying things, especially for self tests. So
take your time pls.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette