[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdX9HjP09R2p-PS4KgHKB6UcAQB+zKqN6QYwsboxtJCkPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 13:04:25 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc: Biju <biju.das.au@...il.com>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Enable 64-bit polling mode for R-Car Gen3 and
RZ/G2+ family
Hi Wolfram,
On Fri, 29 Aug 2025 at 12:26, Wolfram Sang
<wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com> wrote:
> > I believe some of the SoCs that do not support 64-bit accesses, do
> > support 32-bit accesses. Do you think it would be worthwhile adding
> > support for that, too?
>
> We have that already? Check the context after the chunk added to
> tmio_mmc_core.c:
>
> if (host->pdata->flags & TMIO_MMC_32BIT_DATA_PORT) {
> u32 data = 0;
> u32 *buf32 = (u32 *)buf;
> ...
OK, thanks, then I misremembered what exactly is supported and what
is not...
But this is set only on RZ/A1, so my question should be: are there
any other SoCs where TMIO_MMC_32BIT_DATA_PORT should be set?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists