lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3eykohfvqgkbvwirzx63bx65d5uv774gib65bcyjlpphrssfjp@74bqakxvnkmh>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 08:51:51 +0530
From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
To: Shradha Todi <shradha.t@...sung.com>
Cc: 'Krzysztof Kozlowski' <krzk@...nel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, 
	lpieralisi@...nel.org, kwilczynski@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, 
	jingoohan1@...il.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, alim.akhtar@...sung.com, 
	vkoul@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, 
	jh80.chung@...sung.com, pankaj.dubey@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/12] dt-bindings: PCI: Add support for Tesla FSD SoC

On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 02:16:16PM GMT, Shradha Todi wrote:
> > > +
> > > +  phys:
> > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > +
> > > +  samsung,syscon-pcie:
> > > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> > > +    description: phandle for system control registers, used to
> > > +                 control signals at system level
> > 
> > What is "system level"? and what are these "signals" being controlled?
> > 
> 
> I will add a more detailed description for why the syscon is being used
> 
> > 
> > > +title: Tesla FSD SoC series PCIe Host Controller
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > +  - Shradha Todi <shradha.t@...sung.com>
> > > +
> > > +description:
> > > +  Tesla FSD SoCs PCIe host controller inherits all the common
> > > +  properties defined in samsung,exynos-pcie.yaml
> > > +
> > > +allOf:
> > > +  - $ref: /schemas/pci/samsung,exynos-pcie.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    const: tesla,fsd-pcie
> > > +
> > > +  clocks:
> > > +    maxItems: 4
> > > +
> > > +  clock-names:
> > > +    items:
> > > +      - const: aux
> > > +      - const: dbi
> > > +      - const: mstr
> > > +      - const: slv
> > > +
> > > +  num-lanes:
> > > +    maximum: 4
> > > +
> > > +  samsung,syscon-pcie:
> > > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array
> > > +    description: phandle for system control registers, used to
> > > +                 control signals at system level
> > > +
> > > +required:
> > > +  - samsung,syscon-pcie
> > 
> > clocks are required, compatible as well.
> > 
> 
> Since this was inheriting the common exynos yaml file and that had these properties
> under required, I did not mention again. Will take care in next version.
> 

dma-coherent needs to be a required property as well since this binding is
supporting only one controller, that seem to have cache coherent DMA.

> > Missing supplies, both as properties and required. PCI devices do not
> > work without power.
> > 
> 
> According to the HW design of FSD SoC, the control to manage PCIe power is given to
> a separate CPU where custom firmware runs. Therefore, the Linux side does not control
> the PCIe power supplies directly and are hence not included in the device tree.

What do you mean by 'PCIe power'? Supply to the PCIe controller/bus or the
devices connected to the bus?

- Mani

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ