[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250830073345.3imuyvaluskxdjnc@illithid>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 02:33:45 -0500
From: "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@...il.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-man@...r.kernel.org,
Alejandro Colomar <alx@...nel.org>,
André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] man/man2/futex.2: Add a pointer to Linux'
memory-barrier
Hi Sebastian,
At 2025-08-29T18:02:00+0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> diff --git a/man/man2/futex.2 b/man/man2/futex.2
> index 027e91b826bf1..fe4a239c3812c 100644
> --- a/man/man2/futex.2
> +++ b/man/man2/futex.2
> @@ -84,16 +84,14 @@ on the same futex word.
> .\" would be sufficient? Or perhaps for this manual, "serialized" would
> .\" be sufficient, with a footnote regarding "totally ordered" and a
> .\" pointer to the memory-barrier documentation?
> +Please see
> +.IR https://docs.kernel.org/\:next/\:core-api/\:wrappers/\:memory-barriers.html
> +for the definition of atomic operations and memory ordering.
> Thus, the futex word is used to connect the synchronization in user space
> with the implementation of blocking by the kernel.
> Analogously to an atomic
(not a gating/blocking suggestion)
As with my previous comment, you might make the new text a hyperlink.
+See the
+.UR https://docs.kernel.org/\:next/\:core-api/\:wrappers/\:memory-barriers.html
+Linux kernel's guide to atomic operations and memory ordering
+.UE .
Regards,
Branden
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists