[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <536ceeac-a180-47e1-9664-a047929ec3d7@vivo.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 16:25:15 +0800
From: Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@...o.com>
To: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>,
Tiffany Lin <tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>,
Andrew-CT Chen <andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com>,
Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@...iatek.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...nel.org>,
Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzejtp2010@...il.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: mediatek: vcodec: use = { } instead of memset()
在 2025/8/30 2:49, Nicolas Dufresne 写道:
> Hi,
>
>
> Le dimanche 03 août 2025 à 21:55 +0800, Qianfeng Rong a écrit :
>> Based on testing and recommendations by David Lechner et al. [1][2],
>> using = { } to initialize a structure or array is the preferred way
>> to do this in the kernel.
>>
>> This patch converts memset() to = { }, thereby:
>> - Eliminating the risk of sizeof() mismatches.
>> - Simplifying the code.
> Last month, Irui Wang sent an actual fix [0] for uninitialized data in this
> driver. Your patch seems to be related, yet the previous fix is not covered and
> this is not marked as a V2. Since this refactoring collide with an actual fix
> that I'm waiting for a V2, I'd rather not take it and wait.
>
> Any chances you can respin this with a second patches covering Irui's fix ?
Thanks for taking the time to explain!
If there are conflicts, please ignore my patch for now, as it might
not address the actual issue. After Irui's fix is merged, I can
update my patch if necessary.
Best regards,
Qianfeng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists