[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE3SzaSmkjiqkAG8CCsu_ZOqSFSAaETNeZu+mSL9=MHoiSmX2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 23:32:20 +0530
From: Akshay Jindal <akshayaj.lkd@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: anshulusr@...il.com, jic23@...nel.org, dlechner@...libre.com,
nuno.sa@...log.com, andy@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iio: light: ltr390: Implement runtime PM support
Thanks Andy for acknowledging. Follow-up inline.
On Sat, Aug 30, 2025 at 8:16 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 30, 2025 at 4:24 PM Akshay Jindal <akshayaj.lkd@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 30, 2025 at 6:04 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2025 at 2:35 PM Akshay Jindal <akshayaj.lkd@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
> I see now, yeah, this is unfortunate.
> Just rename the leading __ to the _unlocked() suffix. It's easier to read.
I did not get this part. Which function do you think needs to be renamed?
Thanks,
Akshay.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists