[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250829190244.348ce433@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 19:02:44 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: qianjiaru77@...il.com
Cc: michael.chan@...adcom.com, pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] VF Resource State Inconsistency Vulnerability in
Linux bnxt_en Driver
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 21:51:02 +0800 qianjiaru77@...il.com wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] VF Resource State Inconsistency Vulnerability in Linux bnxt_en Driver
Please look at the git history to find out what the normal subject
format is. Something like:
eth: bnxt: fix VF resource inconsistency with old FW API
is probably a good choice.
> From: qianjiaru <qianjiaru77@...il.com>
>
> A state management vulnerability exists in the
> `bnxt_hwrm_reserve_vf_rings()` function of the Linux kernel's
> bnxt_en network driver. The vulnerability causes incomplete
> resource state updates in SR-IOV Virtual Function (VF) environments,
> potentially leading to system instability and resource allocation
> failures in virtualized deployments.
Please *succinctly* explain what the bug is, assuming the person
reading the description can also read the code. Or should I say
ask your LLM to do it, 'cause I really doubt you wrote this bloviated
slop.
> Signed-off-by: qianjiaru <qianjiaru77@...il.com>
You must provide an appropriate Fixes tag for fixes in the Linux kernel.
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists