lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25605c06-0360-4d3d-9ec1-f46f60f0e758@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2025 12:25:41 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
 Dzmitry Sankouski <dsankouski@...il.com>
Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: add mfd/max77705 definitions

On 31/08/2025 12:05, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2025 at 01:21:21AM +0300, Dzmitry Sankouski wrote:
>> +
>> +#ifndef _DT_BINDINGS_MFD_MAX77705_H
>> +#define _DT_BINDINGS_MFD_MAX77705_H
>> +
>> +#define MAX77705_IRQ_CHG	0
>> +#define MAX77705_IRQ_TOP	1
>> +#define MAX77705_IRQ_FG		2
>> +#define MAX77705_IRQ_USBC	3
> 
> There is usually no need to define IRQs as bindings.

Yeah, that's not really a binding.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ