[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33ca2805-aa52-4b27-9fa9-ec582b7129f2@web.de>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2025 21:23:08 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Bharadwaj Raju <bharadwaj.raju777@...il.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] iio: imu: icm20948: add runtime power management
support
…
> @@ -24,17 +24,24 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec
> static int inv_icm20948_temp_read_sensor(struct inv_icm20948_state *state,
> s16 *temp)
> {
> - guard(mutex)(&state->lock);
> + int ret;
> +
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(state->dev);
> + mutex_lock(&state->lock);
>
> __be16 raw;
> - int ret = regmap_bulk_read(state->regmap, INV_ICM20948_REG_TEMP_DATA,
> + ret = regmap_bulk_read(state->regmap, INV_ICM20948_REG_TEMP_DATA,
> &raw, sizeof(raw));
> if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + goto out;
>
> *temp = __be16_to_cpu(raw);
> + ret = 0;
>
> - return 0;
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&state->lock);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(state->dev);
> + return ret;
> }
…
Does anything hinder you with the continued application of scope-based resource management
for such a function implementation?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists