[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLTZk8sK4WOX9RLk@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2025 16:24:03 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
CC: "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>, "joro@...tes.org"
<joro@...tes.org>, "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"jgg@...dia.com" <jgg@...dia.com>, "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"robin.clark@....qualcomm.com" <robin.clark@....qualcomm.com>,
"yong.wu@...iatek.com" <yong.wu@...iatek.com>, "matthias.bgg@...il.com"
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>, "angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, "thierry.reding@...il.com"
<thierry.reding@...il.com>, "vdumpa@...dia.com" <vdumpa@...dia.com>,
"jonathanh@...dia.com" <jonathanh@...dia.com>, "rafael@...nel.org"
<rafael@...nel.org>, "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>, "Liu, Yi L"
<yi.l.liu@...el.com>, "baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "iommu@...ts.linux.dev"
<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "patches@...ts.linux.dev"
<patches@...ts.linux.dev>, "Jaroszynski, Piotr" <pjaroszynski@...dia.com>,
"Sethi, Vikram" <vsethi@...dia.com>, "helgaas@...nel.org"
<helgaas@...nel.org>, "etzhao1900@...il.com" <etzhao1900@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu: Add iommu_get_domain_for_dev_locked()
helper
Hi Kevin,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 07:41:57AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 08:07:01AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > Usually the difference between func() and func_locked() is only about
> > whether the caller holds a lock. If they mean to return different
> > domains, may need better naming (though I don't have a good option
> > now)...
>
> Yea, naming is tricky here :)
>
> Perhaps it could follow a different pattern:
> iommu_dev_get_domain_for_driver(struct device *dev);
>
> With a simple note highlighting to be used by IOMMU drivers in the
> iommu callback functions like attach_dev.
I am keeping this "_locked" naming in v4, as there are only two
places calling this new helper and only one of them is a driver.
Please check v4 and see if you still prefer a different name.
Thanks
Nic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists