linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] kernel_include.py: fix a regression on linux-next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cover.1756732363.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Date: Mon,  1 Sep 2025 15:21:20 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] kernel_include.py: fix a regression on linux-next

Hi Jon,

My past series broke when O= is used. This small series fix it.

Actually, only the first patch is needed. The second one is
a cleanup. I opted to split on two just because it contains
an incompatible behavior change. Not really a problem, as only
media uses kernel-include, but still I opted to keep it in
separate, just in case someone might be needing it.

Mauro Carvalho Chehab (2):
  docs: kernel_include.py: fix an issue when O= is used
  docs: kernel_include.py: drop some old behavior

 Documentation/sphinx/kernel_include.py | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

-- 
2.51.0