linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add display support for QCS615 RIDE board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ae4ef090-7edc-49f8-a964-090bb94ff097@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 11:23:28 +0800
From: Fange Zhang <fange.zhang@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        xiangxu.yin@....qualcomm.com, tingwei.zhang@....qualcomm.com,
        Li Liu <li.liu@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add display support for QCS615
 RIDE board



On 8/28/2025 7:02 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 01:12:14PM +0800, Fange Zhang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 8/28/2025 12:41 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 10:57:41AM +0800, Fange Zhang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 8/28/2025 4:01 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 09:08:39PM +0800, Fange Zhang wrote:
>>>>>> From: Li Liu <li.liu@....qualcomm.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add display MDSS and DSI configuration for QCS615 RIDE board.
>>>>>> QCS615 has a DP port, and DP support will be added in a later patch.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Li Liu <li.liu@....qualcomm.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Fange Zhang <fange.zhang@....qualcomm.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615-ride.dts | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 150 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615-ride.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615-ride.dts
>>>>>> index e663343df75d59481786192cde647017a83c4191..f6e0c82cf85459d8989332497ded8b6ea3670c76 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615-ride.dts
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615-ride.dts
>>>>>> @@ -39,6 +39,76 @@ xo_board_clk: xo-board-clk {
>>>>>>     		};
>>>>>>     	};
>>>>>> +	dp-dsi0-connector {
>>>>>> +		compatible = "dp-connector";
>>>>>> +		label = "DSI0";
>>>>>> +		type = "mini";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +		port {
>>>>>> +			dp_dsi0_connector_in: endpoint {
>>>>>> +				remote-endpoint = <&dsi2dp_bridge_out>;
>>>>>> +			};
>>>>>> +		};
>>>>>> +	};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +	vreg_12p0: vreg-12p0-regulator {
>>>>>
>>>>> I should be more carefull when doing reviews. I thought that it was
>>>>> pointed out already and didn't some of the obvious things...
>>>>>
>>>>> First of all, the nodes are sorted. By the name, not by the label.
>>>>> Second, there are already regulators in this file. Why are the new nodes
>>>>> not following the existing pattern and why are they not placed at a
>>>>> proper place?
>>>>
>>>> Initially, we referred to https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/20250604071851.1438612-3-quic_amakhija@quicinc.com/
>>>> as a reference, but its node ordering seems a bit unconventional.
>>>>
>>>> Would this revised ordering be acceptable?
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>> + dp-dsi0-connector
>>>>
>>>> vreg_conn_1p8: regulator-conn-1p8
>>>> vreg_conn_pa: regulator-conn-pa
>>>> regulator-usb2-vbus
>>>
>>> So... Existing regulator nodes have the name of 'regulator-foo-bar'.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> + vreg_12p0: vreg-12p0-regulator
>>>> + vreg_1p0: vreg-1p0-regulator
>>>> + vreg_1p8: vreg-1p8-regulator
>>>> + vreg_3p0: vreg-3p0-regulator
>>>> + vreg_5p0: vreg-5p0-regulator
>>>
>>> While yours use 'vreg-baz-regulator'. Why? Don't blindly c&p data from
>>> other platforms.
>>
>> Got it, The revised format will be:
>>
>> + vreg_12p0: regulator-vreg-12p0
>> + vreg_1p0: regulator-vreg-1p0
>> + vreg_1p8: regulator-vreg-1p8
>> + vreg_3p0: regulator-vreg-3p0
>> + vreg_5p0: regulator-vreg-5p0
>>
>> Let me know if you have any further suggestions.
> 
> What's the name of power rail in the schematics? vreg-Np0?

I reviewed the Ride board schematics and found the following power rail 
mappings:

VREG_1P0 -> DSI0_DVDD10 / DSI0_AVDD10 -> ANX7625 AVDD10 / DVDD10
VREG_1P8 -> DSI0_AVDD18 -> ANX7625 AVDD18
VREG_S4A_1P8 -> DSI0_DVDD18 -> ANX7625 DVDD18
VIDEO_OUT_VREG_3P3 -> DSI0_AVDD30 -> ANX7625 AVDD30

would the current approach also be acceptable?
or we need configure the power supplies strictly according to this mapping.
Appreciate your guidance.

> 
>