[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ad655ca-7003-4030-bb2d-1c4bcfda30cc@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 15:58:14 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
axelrasmussen@...gle.com, yuanchu@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org,
hughd@...gle.com, mhocko@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com,
vbabka@...e.cz, rppt@...nel.org, surenb@...gle.com, vishal.moola@...il.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, deller@....de,
agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com,
davem@...emloft.net, andreas@...sler.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, chris@...kel.net,
jcmvbkbc@...il.com, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org,
jack@...e.cz, weixugc@...gle.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
rientjes@...gle.com, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, thuth@...hat.com,
broonie@...nel.org, osalvador@...e.de, jfalempe@...hat.com,
mpe@...erman.id.au, nysal@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/12] mm: constify arch_pick_mmap_layout() for
improved const-correctness
On 01.09.25 14:30, Max Kellermann wrote:
> This function only reads from the rlimit pointer (but writes to the
> mm_struct pointer which is kept without `const`).
>
> All callees are already const-ified or (internal functions) are being
> constified by this patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@...il.com>
> ---
[...]
> index 2201da0afecc..0232d983b715 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
> @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static inline void mm_update_next_owner(struct mm_struct *mm)
> #endif
>
> extern void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm,
> - struct rlimit *rlim_stack);
> + const struct rlimit *rlim_stack);
>
> unsigned long
> arch_get_unmapped_area(struct file *filp, unsigned long addr,
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ generic_get_unmapped_area_topdown(struct file *filp, unsigned long addr,
> unsigned long flags, vm_flags_t vm_flags);
> #else
> static inline void arch_pick_mmap_layout(struct mm_struct *mm,
> - struct rlimit *rlim_stack) {}
> + const struct rlimit *rlim_stack) {}
> #endif
Should both these cases also use *const?
(for the latter we probably don't care either, but maybe just to be
consistent)
--
Cheers
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists