[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250901140418.GDaLWn4iNqlpgw75_y@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 16:04:18 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Naveen rao <naveen.rao@....com>, Sairaj Kodilkar <sarunkod@....com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@...or.com>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] x86/cpu/topology: Always try
cpu_parse_topology_ext() on AMD/Hygon
On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 09:51:53AM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Ack! Does "has_xtopology" sound good or should we go for something more
> explicit like "has_xtopology_0x26_0xb"?
has_xtopology with a comment above it to explicitly state what it means,
sounds good.
> Patch 3 will get rid of that "has_topoext" argument in parse_8000_001e()
> entirely so I'll rename the local variable here and use the subsequent
> cleanup for parse_8000_001e().
Ok.
So pls send this one now so that I can queue it as an urgent fix and then the
cleanups can go ontop later.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists