[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8429d6ed-012e-43d9-b6da-c02766e75ddc@lucifer.local>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 15:40:35 +0100
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com, axelrasmussen@...gle.com,
yuanchu@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org, hughd@...gle.com,
mhocko@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, rppt@...nel.org,
surenb@...gle.com, vishal.moola@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, deller@....de,
agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com,
hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
svens@...ux.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net, andreas@...sler.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, chris@...kel.net, jcmvbkbc@...il.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz,
weixugc@...gle.com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, thuth@...hat.com, broonie@...nel.org,
osalvador@...e.de, jfalempe@...hat.com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
nysal@...ux.ibm.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/12] fs: constify mapping related test functions for
improved const-correctness
On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 02:30:20PM +0200, Max Kellermann wrote:
> We select certain test functions which either invoke each other,
> functions that are already const-ified, or no further functions.
>
> It is therefore relatively trivial to const-ify them, which
> provides a basis for further const-ification further up the call
> stack.
>
> Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@...os.com>
> Reviewed-by: Vishal Moola (Oracle) <vishal.moola@...il.com>
(Again, on basis of us figuring out whether we want the double-const)
LGTM, so:
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
> ---
> include/linux/fs.h | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 3b9f54446db0..8dc46337467d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -537,7 +537,8 @@ struct address_space {
> /*
> * Returns true if any of the pages in the mapping are marked with the tag.
> */
> -static inline bool mapping_tagged(struct address_space *mapping, xa_mark_t tag)
> +static inline bool mapping_tagged(const struct address_space *const mapping,
> + const xa_mark_t tag)
> {
> return xa_marked(&mapping->i_pages, tag);
> }
> @@ -585,7 +586,7 @@ static inline void i_mmap_assert_write_locked(struct address_space *mapping)
> /*
> * Might pages of this file be mapped into userspace?
> */
> -static inline int mapping_mapped(struct address_space *mapping)
> +static inline int mapping_mapped(const struct address_space *const mapping)
> {
> return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&mapping->i_mmap.rb_root);
> }
> @@ -599,7 +600,7 @@ static inline int mapping_mapped(struct address_space *mapping)
> * If i_mmap_writable is negative, no new writable mappings are allowed. You
> * can only deny writable mappings, if none exists right now.
> */
> -static inline int mapping_writably_mapped(struct address_space *mapping)
> +static inline int mapping_writably_mapped(const struct address_space *const mapping)
> {
> return atomic_read(&mapping->i_mmap_writable) > 0;
> }
> --
> 2.47.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists