[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <587f46d8-598e-4509-bc19-1e6d1b61a624@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2025 16:49:20 +0200
From: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Russell King
<rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Hanna Hawa <hhhawa@...zon.com>, Robert Marko <robert.marko@...tura.hr>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Imre Kaloz <kaloz@...nwrt.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] i2c: pxa: fix I2C communication on Armada 3700
2025. 09. 01. 11:20 keltezéssel, Andy Shevchenko írta:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 07:13:57PM +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote:
>> There is a long standing bug which causes I2C communication not to
>> work on the Armada 3700 based boards. The first patch in the series
>> fixes that regression. The second patch improves recovery to make it
>> more robust which helps to avoid communication problems with certain
>> SFP modules.
>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - rebase on tip of i2c/for-current
>
> Hmm... Why not the i2c/i2c-host branch? (It's Andi's tree)
>
Simply, because the previous versions of the series were based on that since
they contained a patch for the I2C core code. Additionally, I did not notice
that there is a separate tree for host driver patches.
Although, I could send a new version, but that seems pointless since the i2c-pxa
driver code is the same in both trees currently.
Regards,
Gabor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists